Can you require an employee to tell their employer whether they have been tested for coronavirus/the results of that test?
Yes, this is very likely to amount to a reasonable management instruction which is put in place for public health reasons. Employers should make it clear to their employees that this is something they are required to do and that if they fail to do so this may lead to disciplinary action.
Related FAQs
Employees continue to accrue leave during furlough (whether they are on full furlough or flexible furlough) and can take leave during periods of Flexible Furlough (so long as you top the grant up to full pay for any days taken as holiday).
Government guidance has been updated to state that “Employees should not be placed on furlough for a period simply because they are on holiday for that period.” If a period of furlough happens to coincide with an employee’s holiday then you should ensure that there are business grounds to support furlough being used in that instance so that it isn’t just being used as a means to fund holiday utilisation.
Employees will be reluctant to take unpaid leave or a sabbatical but when faced with the alternative prospect of redundancy may give it some serious consideration. This would remove the cost of that employee from the employer’s business for an agreed period of time. This is an option which can be offered to employees but again, imposing it without agreement creates significant risk.
Government’s Covid-19 landing page
https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus
Covid-19 recovery strategy
Working safely during Covid-19
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/working-safely-during-coronavirus-covid-19
Working safely during Covid-19: construction and other outdoor work
Working safely during Covid-19: factories, plants and warehouses
Working safely during Covid-19: labs and research facilities
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/working-safely-during-coronavirus-covid-19/labs-and-research-facilities
Working safely during Covid-19: offices and contact centres
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/working-safely-during-coronavirus-covid-19/offices-and-contact-centres
Working safely during Covid-19: other people’s homes
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/working-safely-during-coronavirus-covid-19/homes
Working safely during Covid-19: restaurants offering takeaway or delivery
Working safely during Covid-19: shops and branches
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/working-safely-during-coronavirus-covid-19/shops-and-branches
Working safely during Covid-19: vehicles
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/working-safely-during-coronavirus-covid-19/vehicles
Business support: loans, tax relief and grants for businesses, employees and self-employed people
https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus/business-support
Education and childcare
https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus/education-and-childcare
Housing and accommodation: renting: guidance for landlords, tenants and local authorities
Housing and accommodation: moving home
Housing and accommodation: planning inspections
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-planning-inspectorate-guidance
Healthcare workers, carers and care settings: NHS guidance for people working in healthcare
https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/
Healthcare workers, carers and care settings: PPE hub
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/coronavirus-covid-19-personal-protective-equipment-ppe
Healthcare workers, carers and care settings: adult social care guidance
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/coronavirus-covid-19-social-care-guidance
Healthcare workers, carers and care settings: shielding and protecting people who are clinically extremely vulnerable
Healthcare workers, carers and care settings: adult social care guidance
Healthcare workers, carers and care settings: health, care and volunteer workers parking pass and concessions
International travel and immigration: travel advice for British citizens travelling abroad
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/travel-advice-novel-coronavirus
International travel and immigration: foreign travel advice for each country
https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice
International travel and immigration: waiting to return to the UK
International travel and immigration: essential international travel guidance
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-essential-international-travel-guidance
International travel and immigration: advice for UK visa applicants and temporary UK residents
Government’s financial support for businesses
This page help businesses find out how to access the support that has been made available, who is eligible, when the schemes open and how to apply.
https://www.businesssupport.gov.uk/coronavirus-business-support/
Rishi Sunak
The Twitter feed of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, where he has published various responses to some FAQs from the public.
https://twitter.com/RishiSunak
Directors of a company that is in, or potentially facing, financial difficulty have a duty to act in the best interests of creditors as a whole. Failure to comply with that duty can have consequences for directors (including personal liability and disqualification if directors get it wrong).
The duty to act in the best interests of creditors as a whole begins when the company is (or in some cases is potentially or at risk of becoming) insolvent i.e. its assets are worth less than its liabilities and/or the business is unable to pay its liabilities as and when they fall due. However, just because a company is insolvent doesn’t always necessarily mean than an insolvency process is inevitable. Sometimes, the insolvency might just be caused by a temporary cashflow problem or perhaps wider problems in the business that can be overcome by making changes to the business itself.
In addition to that, the potential liability of directors ramps up even further when the company reaches the stage that the directors have concluded (or ought to have concluded) that there was no reasonable prospect of the business avoiding liquidation or administration. If the business reaches that stage, in addition to having to act in the best interests of creditors as a whole, directors can find themselves personally liable unless, from the time the directors ought to have reached that conclusion, they took every step that they ought to have done to minimise the loss to creditors. This is known as wrongful trading.
On the 25th June 2020, the government introduced new legislation – the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 – which includes measures to temporarily relax the rules around wrongful trading with the proposed changes to take effect retrospectively from the 1st March 2020. Essentially, the changes say that any court looking at a potential wrongful trading claim against a director is to assume that the director is not responsible for worsening the company’s financial position between 1st March 2020 and the 30th September 2020. Whilst the wrongful trading rules have relaxed, directors still need to proceed with caution if the business is potentially insolvent as the new Act does alter other potential pitfalls for directors, like the risk of breaching their duties or allowing the company to enter into transactions that can potentially be challenged.
The support being offered by the government is potentially a lifeline for businesses under pressure through no fault of their own, but notwithstanding the recent changes to the wrongful trading rules it is still likely to be important for the board to carefully consider whether it is appropriate to make use of the loans, grants and tax forbearance that are on offer.
Exactly what the board should consider will vary from business to business and getting it right can sometimes involve balancing several different (and at times conflicting) priorities, challenges and concerns.
The amount an insurer charges for providing cover is a critical aspect of the underwriting process. The premium must be sufficient to cover expected claims but must also take into account the possibility that the insurer will have to access its capital reserve –it is risk assessment based and the greater the risk, the higher the premium. Historically, insurers of high-rise buildings would have only had to prepare for a loss caused by damage to just a few flats within a building. That is because the design and construction of that building, with the right materials and fire safety provisions in place, should have limited the spread of fire and allowed the damage to be contained –or at least make this an extremely low risk. Now we know that many buildings have been designed, built and signed off in a regulatory system that an independent Government review has found was not fit for purpose. Premiums will reduce overtime but will be dependent upon the perceived level of risk reducing as the regulatory regime, BSA and BSR become more established.