Skip to content

Martin has a wide commercial practice. He has a particular interest in high value disputes involving financial mis-selling and also in pension and trust disputes.

Martin regularly acts in insurance disputes. He also has a number of large public authority client disputes which he advises in respect of pension matters and matters of procurement.

He is dually qualified as a solicitor and barrister.

Experience

Martin’s experience includes:

  • Acting for a large multi-national Belgian company in respect of an action for a Contribution Notice in the sum of £23 million brought against it by the Pensions Regulator (Pensions Regulator v Michel Van de Wiele NV – [2011] All ER (D) 138 (Feb);
  • Acting for a group of Claimants in a multi-million dispute with an international financial institution arising from advice in respect of their Self Invested Personal Pension (SIPP) arrangements;
  • Assisting a local authority pension scheme in its group action against a UK bank for a breach of
  • Acting for insurance brokers in the interpretation of an indemnity under a Directors & Officers (D&O) Policy;
  • section 91 of the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) 2000 in a multi-million pound action;
  • Following the Lehman collapse in 2009, acting for a local authority pension scheme in a claim against its advisers in respect of a Forward Foreign Exchange (FFX) contract;
  • Acting for a Claimant Commissioning Group (CCG) in an application to lift the suspensory effect of a claim against it pursuant to section 47 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2006;
  • Acting for beneficiaries under a trust in multi-party proceedings alleging breaches of trustees’ duties in respect of their investment powers;
  • Acting for the tax-payer in a multi-million pound dispute with HM Revenue & Customs as regards the interpretation of Extra-Statutory Commission (ESC) D33 and Zim Properties v Proctor;
  • Acting for a group of Claimants in respect of claims against UK bank for the misselling of interest rate swaps;
  • Acting for the insured in respect of the declinature of insurance cover following a fire.
  • Acting on behalf of a retired teacher and member of the Teachers’ Pensions Scheme in the defence of a claim brought by Teachers’ Pensions for the repayment of monies (Webber v Department for Education [2014] EWHC 4240 (Ch);  [2015] WLR (D) 14

Briefing: regulatory issues highlighted by the collapse of Secured Energy Bonds

 

Related news

What our clients say

  • "I am writing to thank you sincerely for the outstanding service you have given me over the past few months, you literally took the harassment and worry away from me from the onset, you advised me, kept me informed throughout this difficult period and gave me personal, professional attention at all times. I cannot thank you enough and have absolutely no hesitation in recommending you to anyone."

Independent verdict

  • "Very much focused on getting the best result for his client."

    Chambers & Partners
  • "Martin Woodford is deemed to be a 'real class act' and complimented on his client service and high quality of work. He comes particularly recommended for his significant experience in financial services disputes."

    Chambers & Partners
  • "Martin Woodford ‘exudes common sense and good judgement’."